🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy could be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this international conversation continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.